Genarlow Wilson had served two years of a year sentence in prison for having consensual oral sex with another teenager. Genarlow Wilson had been sentenced to 10 years in prison for having consensual oral sex with another teenager. A judge has ordered the release of a man who is serving a year prison sentence for having consensual oral sex with a year-old girl when he was The year sentence had been widely criticized as grossly disproportionate to the crime.
Genarlow Wilson released after Georgia Supreme Court decision
Wilson, who was the homecoming king at Douglas County High, was a track and football star that would have played college football, his coaches said. He was all-conference in football and even held future NFL first-round draft pick Calvin Johnson to four catches in two games, according to his coaches. The justices also said Wilson's sentence made "no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment," and his crime did not rise to the "level of adults who prey on children. John Lewis, an Atlanta Democrat, said: "Each day that this young man spent in prison was a day too long. To help make this website better, to improve and personalize your experience and for advertising purposes, are you happy to accept cookies and other technologies? Georgia's high court frees Wilson from prison.
Man Freed After 18 Months in Jail for Violating Sodomy Law
Best video. Georgia prison oral sex. Oral care is provided to each inmate in accordance with established guidelines under the direction and supervision of a dentist licensed in the state of Georgia. Every inmate has access to the full range of dental services offered at the resident facility or referral facility. Services offered are in accordance with the assigned classification level of each facility into one of five different levels.
Wilson v. State , S. Wilson was convicted of aggravated child molestation in , after, at the age of 17, he had engaged in oral sex with a year-old at a New Year's Eve party, an offense carrying a mandatory penalty of 10 years' imprisonment. At the time of his conviction, provisions for similarity in age that allowed underage consent to be taken into account were only applicable to vaginal sex. Because the case involved oral sex, the consent of the girl was not at that time legally relevant.